Ensuring the integrity of ERF activities and making sure that they genuinely contribute to a reduction in emissions require a number of conditions to be met. Together, those conditions make up a standard of offsets integrity. The integrity standards can be summarised as follows:
-
The additionality standard - The carbon farming activity and abatement must be additional to what would have taken place in the absence of the project. As explained above, this requirement is essential because it underpins confidence and the credibility of the scheme.
-
The measurability standard - The abatement must be measurable and verifiable. Without measurement, it would not be possible to issue ACCUs. ACCUs must be related to the precise quantity of greenhouse gases avoided or sequestered by the project. This amount must be verifiable, again to ensure confidence in the abatement achieved.
-
The science standard - The measurement must be supported by good peer-reviewed science and be consistent with Australia's international greenhouse accounts. The measurement of greenhouse gas abatement and sequestration on the land is scientifically complex and is based on a wide variety of mechanisms and biophysical processes, many of which have been revealed only through careful scientific study and measurement. Peer-reviewed science is the main means of understanding greenhouse processes on the land and is thus central to abatement under the ERF.
-
The leakage standard - The measurement methods must account for leakage. Leakage is an unintended increase in greenhouse gas emissions from an activity outside the project that occurs as a result of the project. It is often due to economic interactions between activities.
-
The variability standard - The measurement methods must account for variability and cyclical variations that may result from climate variations or management practices. Emissions avoidance or sequestration is not necessarily constant throughout the life of a project.
-
The conservative standard - The measurement methods must use conservative assumptions. Where assumptions are needed to establish measurements, the assumptions must be conservative and lean towards understating the abatement.
-
The permanence standard - Sequestration must be permanent. Carbon sequestered from the atmosphere must be permanently maintained where it is stored; otherwise, abatement will only be temporary and not genuinely permanent. Under the original CFI, sequestration projects were subject to a 100-year permanence obligation. The ERF allows an option for a 25-year permanence requirement.
Explore the full Workshop Manual: The business case for carbon farming: improving your farm’s sustainability (January 2021)
Read the report
RESEARCH REPORTS
1. Introduction: background to the business case
This chapter lays out the basic background and groundwork of the manual
RESEARCH REPORTS
1.2 Being clear about the reasons for participating
Introduction: background to the business case
RESEARCH REPORTS
1.4 Working through the business case for carbon farming
Introduction: background to the business case
RESEARCH REPORTS
1.5 Factors determining project economics
Introduction: background to the business case
RESEARCH REPORTS
1.8 Important features of the business case
Introduction: background to the business case
RESEARCH REPORTS
2. How carbon is farmed under the ERF
This chapter considers in detail the activities that constitute carbon farming
RESEARCH REPORTS
2.5 Carbon farming under the Emissions Reduction Fund
How carbon is farmed under the ERF
RESEARCH REPORTS
3. The policy context and the price of ACCUs
This chapter takes a broad look at the policy context for carbon farming