Workshop Manual: The business case for carbon farming: improving your farm’s sustainability (January 2021)

2.3 Sequestration activities

How carbon is farmed under the ERF

The business case for carbon farming: improving your farm’s sustainability

Explore the full Workshop Manual: The business case for carbon farming: improving your farm’s sustainability (January 2021)

 
Sequestration projects generate credits by removing CO2 from the atmosphere, absorbing it and then storing it permanently. Forms of sequestration include the absorption of carbon by plants as they grow and increase organic matter in the soil.
Table 2.3 summarises sequestration project types on the positive list. Sequestration activities include reforestation, revegetation, restoring rangelands and protecting native forests or vegetation that would otherwise be cleared.
 
 
Table 2.3: Carbon sequestration project types on the positive list
 
 

Project type

 
 

Plantings
  • small-scale farm forestry plantations (for harvest)
  • permanent plantings (not for harvest)
  • new long-rotation hardwood plantations (for harvest).
Assisted regeneration/restoration
  • human-induced regeneration of native vegetation
  • reforestation by environmental or mallee plantings
Forest protection
  • protection of native forest from clearing or harvest.
  • avoided clearing of native regrowth
Soil carbon
  • estimating sequestration of carbon in soil
  • sequestrating carbon in soil in agricultural systems

Source:
 Appendix C.
 

Carbon sequestration in plantings can generate ACCUs only if the carbon is stored permanently. If it is subsequently released back into the atmosphere, for example because vegetation is cleared, it does not offset emissions and does not generate an ACCU.
For this reason, under the original CFI legislation, sequestration projects were subject to a 100-year permanence obligation.
The permanence obligation ensures that credits are for a genuine form of abatement. If carbon stores are not maintained, or the vegetation is cleared, the emissions are released again into the atmosphere and the project would have had no net effect on emissions. 

2.3.1 Permanence under the ERF

The permanence obligation has been modified under the ERF, allowing the option of a 25-year permanence requirement.
Proponents of sequestration projects can nominate a 25- or 100-year permanence period. Projects with a 25-year permanence period will be subject to a 20% discount on the number of credits that would otherwise be issued for the project.
Existing sequestration projects can request a 25-year permanence period and relinquish credits as necessary to reflect the 20% crediting discount.

 

 

Explore the full Workshop Manual: The business case for carbon farming: improving your farm’s sustainability (January 2021)

Read the report

RESEARCH REPORTS

1. Introduction: background to the business case

This chapter lays out the basic background and groundwork of the manual

RESEARCH REPORTS

1.1 Overview

Introduction: background to the business case

RESEARCH REPORTS

1.2 Being clear about the reasons for participating

Introduction: background to the business case

RESEARCH REPORTS

1.3 Key steps in a decision process

Introduction: background to the business case

RESEARCH REPORTS

1.4 Working through the business case for carbon farming

Introduction: background to the business case

RESEARCH REPORTS

1.5 Factors determining project economics

Introduction: background to the business case

RESEARCH REPORTS

1.6 Elements of the business case

Introduction: background to the business case

RESEARCH REPORTS

1.7 Building an economic case

Introduction: background to the business case

RESEARCH REPORTS

1.8 Important features of the business case

Introduction: background to the business case

RESEARCH REPORTS

1.9 The plan of this manual

Introduction: background to the business case

RESEARCH REPORTS

2. How carbon is farmed under the ERF

This chapter considers in detail the activities that constitute carbon farming

RESEARCH REPORTS

2.1 The scope of carbon farming under the ERF

How carbon is farmed under the ERF

RESEARCH REPORTS

2.2 Emissions avoidance activities

How carbon is farmed under the ERF

RESEARCH REPORTS

2.3 Sequestration activities

How carbon is farmed under the ERF

RESEARCH REPORTS

2.4 The negative list

How carbon is farmed under the ERF

RESEARCH REPORTS

2.5 Carbon farming under the Emissions Reduction Fund

How carbon is farmed under the ERF

RESEARCH REPORTS

2.6 Who's who in the CFI and the ERF

How carbon is farmed under the ERF

RESEARCH REPORTS

3. The policy context and the price of ACCUs

This chapter takes a broad look at the policy context for carbon farming

RESEARCH REPORTS

3.1 The policy context

The policy context and the price of ACCUs

RESEARCH REPORTS

3.2 A documented climate challenge…

The policy context and the price of ACCUs

RESEARCH REPORTS

3.3 … with numerous policy responses

The policy context and the price of ACCUs

TOPICS:

A growing series of reports, each focused on a key discussion point for the farming sector, brought to you by the Kondinin team.

A growing series of reports, each focused on a key discussion point for the farming sector, brought to you by the Kondinin team.

editions

Research Report: Field Days Wrap (November 2024)

Kondinin Group's research team has the low down on the latest gear that was on show at various field days held around the country in the past few months.

editions

Research Report: Trailing Sheep Feeders (October 2024)

Trailing sheep feeders are on the menu for Kondinin Group's October Research Report with nine popular models covered.

editions

Research Report: Livestock Management Software (September 2024)

Kondinin Group's September Research Report looks at a range of livestock management software platforms which can make life a lot easier when it comes to efficient sheep and cattle production.

editions

Research Report: Grain Storage (August 2024)

This month's Research Report from Kondinin Group looks at the benefits and challenges associated with ground level storage with a focus on growers who have done it successfully.